5 found
Order:
  1.  15
    Legal Interventions to Counter COVID-19 Denialism.James G. Hodge, Jennifer L. Piatt & Leila Barraza - 2021 - Journal of Law, Medicine and Ethics 49 (4):677-682.
    A series of denialist state laws thwart efficacious public health emergency response efforts despite escalating impacts of the spread of the Delta variant during the COVID-19 pandemic.
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation  
  2.  7
    Supreme Court Impacts in Public Health Law: 2022-2023.James G. Hodge, Leila Barraza, Jennifer L. Piatt, Erica N. White, Summer Ghaith, Samantha Hollinshead, Lauren Krumholz, Madisyn Puchebner & Emma Smith - 2023 - Journal of Law, Medicine and Ethics 51 (3):684-688.
    In another tumultuous term of the United States Supreme Court in 2022-2023 a series of critical cases implicate instant and forthcoming changes in multiple fronts that collectively shift the national public health law and policy environment.
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  3.  11
    Midterm Maelstrom: Public Health Legal Impacts of Election 2022.James G. Hodge, Leila Barraza, Jennifer L. Piatt & Erica N. White - 2023 - Journal of Law, Medicine and Ethics 51 (1):208-212.
    Among the morass of critical issues impacting the results of the midterm elections in 2022 were core public health issues related to health care access, justice, and reforms. Collectively, voters’ communal health and safety concerns dominated outcomes in key races which may shape national, state, and local legal approaches to protecting the public’s health in the modern era.
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  4.  8
    Post-COVID U.S. Legal Reforms Promoting Public Health and Equity.James G. Hodge, Sarah Wetter, Jennifer L. Piatt & Hanna Reinke - 2020 - Journal of Law, Medicine and Ethics 48 (4):784-788.
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  5.  7
    Regressive Federalism, Rights Reversals, and the Public’s Health.James G. Hodge, Jennifer L. Piatt, Leila Barraza & Erica N. White - 2022 - Journal of Law, Medicine and Ethics 50 (2):375-379.
    As the United States emerges from the worst public health threat it has ever experienced, the Supreme Court is poised to reconsider constitutional principles from bygone eras. Judicial proposals to roll back rights under a federalism infrastructure grounded in states’ interests threaten the nation’s legal fabric at a precarious time. This column explores judicial shifts in 3 key public health contexts — reproductive rights, vaccinations, and national security — and their repercussions.
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark